Disputed Wills

Disputed Wills are claims against deceased estates by potential beneficiaries left out of a relative’s will.

A person is able to create their will however they please but that doesn’t mean you can’t exercise your rights and dispute it.

Queensland law allows family members or dependants who suffer hardship because they have been overlooked or inadequately provided for in a will, to bring a lawsuit for estate allocation to them.

Written notice must be given within six (6) months and legal action commenced within nine (9) months of the date of death. To get started, collect relevant information as best you can including a list of estate assets, a list of surviving dependants and particulars of your relationship with the deceased.

Claims against deceased estates can be made from the perspective of:-

  • Executors or administrators managing a deceased estate
  • A child, spouse, dependant or former wife left out of a will
  • A beneficiary wishing to challenge the fairness of a will
  • A child or spouse who wishes to administer the estate of a deceased who died with no will
  • An executor or beneficiary who is concerned about the validity of a will
  • A child, spouse or dependant who is suspicious of the influence of another person over the terms of the will

More on who can contest a will.

Dealing with the shock of your loss can be helped by having a clear understanding of the legal position relating to your loved one’s estate.

Get Expert Advice Now 

Carter Capner Law can provide you with expert advice about how the deceased’s estate should be collected and distributed, and those who are entitled to expect a share.
All executors, dependants, family members and beneficiaries should be aware of the types of challenges that can be mounted against a will.

Family Provision

A spouse, child or dependant, for whom insufficient provision has been made his or her proper maintenance and support, can contend for a Family Provision from the estate for their benefit under the Succession Act.

The contest can be resolved by agreement but if not, is determined by a court. What needs to be considered are the relative financial positions of the parties; relationships between the deceased and all potential beneficiaries; the size of the estate; any special needs; and the fairness of reducing benefits to specified beneficiaries for the benefit of someone who has been intentionally omitted.

Time Limits: An executor may distribute an estate if after six months, no notice has been received by any intending beneficiary. Persons considering a Family Provision application should therefore give prompt notice through their lawyer to the executor of their intentions.

Suspicious Wills – Undue Influence

Wills can be challenged if they are made under the influence of an overbearing relative, friend or advisor. This usually occurs when there is an imbalance of power in the relationship, where the weaker party agrees to the more dominant party’s desires contrary to their wishes. A full examination of all the circumstances under which the will or codicil was made is required.


Creating a will is important however as people get older they may lose capacity to make one. To have capacity the testator needs to know what a will is, what their property is and the people that have a reasonable claim to the estate. Someone with, for example, dementia, can only make a valid will (or vary one) during a medically certified “lucid” period or by application to the Supreme Court. Capacity can be a source of dispute in estate administration.

Will drafting

Sometimes beneficiaries do not receive what they were expecting or what the deceased intended because of the way a will was drafted. Will drafting can be a source of dispute in estate administration.

Enquire About Disputing a Will


Ademption – The transfer or sale prior to death of an asset given by will to a beneficiary. Can be the source of a dispute among beneficiaries.

Alteration – Inked-in alterations to a will or codicil raise issues of “validity” and undue influence that can be a source of dispute.

Bequest – A gift in a will. Sometimes subject to dispute if insufficiently described.

Child – Any child, stepchild or adopted child of the deceased including child unborn at their death, provided the child is born alive and remains alive for a period of 30 days.

Capacity – A testator must have legal capacity to make a valid will. Someone with, for example, dementia, can only make a valid will (or vary one) during a medically certified “lucid” period or by application to the Supreme Court. Capacity can be a source of dispute in estate administration.

Dependent – A person – for Family Provision purposes – who is wholly or substantially supported by the deceased person at the time of their death including a parent, a parent of a surviving child under 18 and anyone under the age of 18 years.

Debts – Most personal debts survive your death and can be recovered from the estate by the person to whom the debt is owed. These are paid (along with estate and funeral expenses) before the estate is distributed to beneficiaries.

De facto – Refers to a couple living together on a “genuine domestic basis”. The relationship is established by circumstances including residence, interdependence, joint property ownership, shared children and household tasks. For Family Provision and Intestacy rules, the person must have lived together with the deceased as a couple for a continuous period of at least 2 years up to the deceased’s death. A shared residence does not of itself prove a de facto relationship.

Divorce – Gifts to former spouses in wills made prior to a divorce are void but the will remains valid.

Execution – The formal signing of a will which is required to be in the presence of two independent witnesses, both present at the same place at the same time. Incorrect execution can be a source of dispute.

Executor – The person or persons appointed to efficiently manage estate assets, make payments on behalf of infant beneficiaries pending distribution, sell the assets and make distributions to beneficiaries.

Fess to Executor – An executor may charge an estate “executor’s commission”. Depends on the extent of the executor’s “pains and troubles” but can be as high as 6% on income derived and 5% on capital realised. Cannot be charged without an order of the court or unanimous agreement of beneficiaries

Guardian – The person of whom you express the desire to take day-to-day care of infant children orphaned by your death. Only comes into effect after the death of both parents.

Hotchpot – The taking into account of a pre-death gift to a beneficiary and setting off the value of the gift against that beneficiary’s entitlement.

Issue – Same as “child”.

Intestacy – The absence of a valid disposition to potential beneficiaries. If a deceased dies without a will, the administrator must distribute assets (mostly to spouse and children) according to specific rules. Where there are no surviving relatives, all funds go to the state.

Jointly Owned – Property “in joint names” (usually the husband and wife) for example, bank accounts or a family home, do not become part of the estate but rather, pass automatically to the surviving joint owner.

Kin – Next of Kin are the relatives amongst whom an intestate estate is distributed if there is no surviving spouse or child. They include siblings, nieces & nephews in the first-tier; grandparents in the second tier; and uncles, aunts & cousins in the third tier.

Letters of Administration – A “grant” from the court authorising a relative or creditor of the deceased who has died without a will, to administer their estate.

Life Interest – The right to use an asset, e.g. a home, or to receive income from the asset during a beneficiary’s lifetime after which, it reverts to the estate for distribution to other beneficiaries.

Life Insurance – The proceeds of life insurance become part of the estate requiring distribution to beneficiaries.

Marriage. A will is automatically revoked by a legal marriage, unless the will was made expressly “in contemplation” of that marriage.

Mutual wills. Wills made as a result of an agreement, eg between a couple, to provide corresponding benefits in each of their wills. Such arrangements or can be the subject of an estate dispute if for example one of the pair changes their will after the death of their partner.

Newsagent – DIY will kits from a newsagency or elsewhere are often incorrectly completed or incorrectly executed. They are often the subject of estate disputes.

Outgoings – Sometimes the source of dispute in relation to a bequest or life interest, if the will makes no provision as to whether they should be borne by the estate and for what period.

Per Stirpes – A term to describe how property should be distributed when a beneficiary (who has children) dies before the testator to provide for the deceased beneficiary’s share being paid to his or her children.

Probate – The court’s official recognition of a will and a person’s authority to deal with the estate. Except in the case of estates involving only small bank balances, Probate must be obtained before an executor can take control of the estate’s assets.

Queensland Supreme Court – The court that exercise jurisdiction over wills, trusts, estates and infant beneficiaries. Claims of less than $750k can often be resolved in the District Court.

Renunciation – The act of a person declining their appointment as executor under a will.

Revocation – The formal cancellation of an earlier will. The making of a new will usually has that effect automatically.

Spouse – includes husband, wife, de facto partner and a former husband or wife, if they are receiving, or entitled to receive, maintenance from the deceased and have not remarried. The life partner (married, de facto, heterosexual or same sex) to whom a simple gifts the whole of your estate provided they survive you by 30 days.

Survivorship – Where 2 or more persons die in the same calamity and it is unknown which of them died first, the deaths are “presumed to have occurred in order of seniority” with the younger surviving the elder “for a period of 1 day”.

Superannuation – Most policies contain death benefits. If the subject of a “binding nomination” the benefits are (subject to discretion of the fund’s trustee) paid in accordance with the directions contained in the nomination.

Testator – The person who makes a will.

Undue Influence – Coercive-like conduct or manipulation exercised upon a testator to provide benefits under a will that can be relied on by another person to challenge its validity.

Vehicle – A chattel commonly within an estate that may have been “adeemed”.

Will – Includes a codicil which is a document required to be executed in the same formal manner as a will, that amends a prior will.

Examination – The process taken by the court’s Registrar prior to the grant of Probate.

Executor’s Year – The period of 12 months allowed to an executor of a deceased estate to pay, free of interest, any legacy left by the will.

Zone – Wills can be expressed to relate to property only within one location (eg. Australia), which relieves the executor from taking steps in relation to assets located elsewhere (in respect of which the testator is presumed to have made other arrangements).


Call Peter Carter on 1300 529 529 or make an online enquiry so steps can be taken promptly to protect your interests



  • ”LawSpace is amazing. How come someone hasn’t done this sooner?””Gavin”

  • ”Thank you Carter Capner in believing in me. I found the prospect of pursuing a legal claim quite traumatic at first until I dealt with your expert and professional staff. Your firm is to be highly commended for its work and rest assured that I will recommend you to anyone I know. Sincerest thanks.””Alan”

  • ”Thanks to a wonderful team of genuine troopers! I would recommend Carter Capner unconditionally.””Shannon”

  • ”Previous dealings with a law firm had made us extremely wary of engaging the services of another firm. Carter Capner was recommended to us by a friend and we have been very impressed by their exceptional service throughout. You have restored our faith in lawyers.””Christian”

  • ”We used Carter Capner due to the good name of the firm. The continual updates throughout our transaction were reassuring. We were very happy with the end result.””Vladimir”

  • ”Your people are the best! Give them a gold star.””Natasha”

  • ”I found the people at Carter Capner to be dynamic, caring and always smiling. Their services exceeded all of my expectations. If I ever encounter friends needing a solicitor I let them know who to call. Your staff are the very best!””Dennis”

  • ”Carter Capner provides a straightforward approach to my legal matter. Explanations of procedures were clear, prompt and courteous. I would have no hesitation in engaging Carter Capner again.””Danny”

  • ”I appreciated the friendly and engaging relationship that was established. We were kept up to date and the advice we received was always accurate, friendly and caring.””Colin”

  • ”I was attracted to Carter Capner’s service right from the start. My solicitor was extremely helpful and his expertise achieved a better outcome than I had initially expected. My phone calls were always returned promptly and if I had a question, advice was always on hand.””Valma”

  • ”All paper work was perfect and everything went smoothly. Above and beyond the call.””Max

  • ”Carter Capner Law was very professional and kept me up to date all the time. You dealt with my transaction fast and efficiently and I was very impressed with the service.””Anna”

  • ”Great job – THANKS””Collin”

  • ”Sincere thanks again for your services with Gorden and Clifford sale – always a pleasure dealing with you and we look forward to future contact.””Mal”

  • ”I wanted to pass on my appreciation of how well Carter Capner Law handled our settlement.””Pip”

  • ”I was recommended to Carter Capner Law from a business associate and was immediately surprised and pleasedat how open the staff were with my case prospects. In all dealings with Carter Capner Law and their appointed representatives, I felt I was being looked after in a very professional manner that left no doubt in my mind the organisation has the very best intention for all clients. They at all times made sure I was kept fully informed and if I was unsure of a particular issue they would advise the correct course of action.””Michael”

  • ”I truly appreciate all that you do for me Peter and need to tell you that your staff are exceptional workers and great to work with. A fantastic team indeed – the first law firm I have found to not only be professional but also personal and friendly at the same time… AND DO THINGS RIGHT!””Michael”

  • ”I want to say thanks for everything. I am really happy with your service.””Raj”

  • ”I cannot fault Carter Capner Law’s professionalism. There was a genuine interest in me as a person and not simply another client. My case culminated in a positive outcome and successful restuls. To all involved, thak you for your hard work.””Mark”

  • ”Thank you for all your work and keeping me infomed in a timely matter all through my case. I really appreciate the diligence in working on my behalf. It has been a pleasure and I would like to make a commendation to your law firm for a job well done.””Selma”

  • ”Carter Capner delivered exactly what they promised from day one. A first class experience and a terrific result. I have absolutely no hesitation in recommending them to other people. I was kept informed and up to date the whole way through the process, and ended up achieving a great result above my expectations. Many thanks again to you and your team””Cameron”

  • ”Laura did a fantastic job on our new property settlement. Her service and response time were excellent””David

  • ”Thank you very much for your very professional attention to this matter for us. We will certainly be seeking your services should we need legal services in the future.””B

  • ”Undertaking legal procedures can be a stressful event but Carter Capner Lawyers were there to assist me in anyway possible. I appreciate your time and effort and taking away the stress for me. Thanks.””Kelly

  • ”Carter Capner provided exceptional service, professionalism and took a personal interest. Great value for money.””Anthony”

  • ”Nothing ever seemed too much trouble and I had the utmost confidence that I was dealing with a top class law firm. Many thanks.””Lionel”

  • ”Your advice was practical, professional, friendly and easy to understand!””Chris”

  • ”Excellent! Your were extremely helpful in every way and I would like to thank you all for the smooth running of my transaction.””Shane”

  • ”I would have no hesitation in engaging Carter Capner for further representation.””Danny”

  • ”I would like to take this opportunity to thank Carter Capner for your assistance and efforts. I appreciated the courtesy, friendliness and simple explanations to my questions. You exceeded my expectations!””Martin”

  • ”I was very pleased with your handling of my transaction and with the extra personal touches. Thank you to all who made me feel welcome and involved throughout.””Christopher”

  • ”Working with the people at Carter Capner was a pleasure. I received professional advice and service and was always kept informed on progress. I was delighted with the time and effort and the outcome was excellent. Thank you Carter Capner for making a stressful time easier, I have no hesitation in recommending your services.””Sydney”

  • ”I thought my case was lacking sufficient evidence and that my case may not have been worth pursuing, but Carter Capner prevailed. Your excellent service and the professionalism ensured success. I was very grateful to have such an experienced team on board.””Angela”