For original source and Spanish version, click here.

Following a distressing incident on LATAM Airlines flight LA800 from Sydney to Auckland, passengers might be able to seek compensation for their ordeal. Aviation lawyer Peter Carter draws comparisons to a similar Qantas incident from 2008, offering hope for affected passengers.

Incident Overview
On a routine flight, passengers experienced a terrifying sudden drop, reminiscent of the Qantas QF72 incident in 2008. The LATAM Airlines incident has reignited discussions about passenger rights and compensation in unexpected in-flight emergencies.

Legal Perspective
Peter Carter, an aviation law expert, suggests that passengers from the LATAM flight could be entitled to significant compensation for any sustained injuries or psychological trauma, mirroring the aftermath of the Qantas incident where affected passengers received settlements beyond standard limits.

Compensation Framework
The 1999 Montreal Convention dictates compensation terms, but as Carter highlights, the actual compensation can exceed the convention’s standard limits if the airline’s negligence is proven. This legal framework ensures that passengers can claim for their actual losses and damages.

Passenger Impact
The incident’s impact extends beyond immediate physical injuries, encompassing potential long-term psychological effects. Carter emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing the full spectrum of consequences faced by passengers.

Legal Developments
Post-QF72 incident, aviation compensation regulations have evolved, potentially benefiting the LATAM flight passengers. Carter’s ongoing analysis may pave the way for substantial claims, emphasizing the significance of passengers understanding their rights.

As investigations continue, the parallels drawn between the LATAM and Qantas incidents underscore the importance of passenger safety and the aviation industry’s accountability. Passengers aboard LATAM flight LA800 are encouraged to explore their compensation options, supported by legal precedents and expert insights.