Incident Overview
In March 2025, a Sydney-based cleaning business director experienced a significant financial loss when an artificial intelligence tool generated an inaccurate email quote to a client. The AI-generated message contained multiple errors in service descriptions and pricing, resulting in a $2000 loss when the client selected a competitor instead.
The incident has prompted workplace safety and legal experts to issue formal warnings about the risks of over-relying on generative AI tools without proper verification protocols.
Site and Time
The error occurred at End Of Lease Cleaning Melbourne’s Sydney office in March 2025. The business director discovered the mistake approximately one week after sending the AI-generated email to the client.
Persons Involved
Affected Party
- Michael, director of End Of Lease Cleaning Melbourne
Other Parties
- Client who received the inaccurate quote and selected a competitor service
Plant and Task
Tool Used
- Generative AI email composition tool (unspecified platform)
Task
- Generating business quotes and service details for client communications to reduce email response time
Injuries / Fatalities
Fatalities
Injuries
Nature of the Error
The AI tool repeatedly generated incorrect service descriptions, most notably listing a full wall clean valued at $500–$700 instead of the cheaper spot clean service. In the March 2025 incident, the AI-generated email contained several inaccuracies in the high-value cleaning job quote. The business director skimmed the email before sending it to the client, unaware of the errors.
“If you are using AI, you definitely need to read everything two to three times before you send that email.” — Michael, Director, End Of Lease Cleaning Melbourne
Legal and Workplace Warnings
Expert Guidance
- Legal experts Robyn Chatwood and Michael Park (Dentons) confirmed that employees remain liable for AI-generated content, regardless of errors
- AI “hallucinations” (incorrect facts generated by the tool) can lead to misinformation, confidentiality breaches, and copyright violations
- Workers cannot shift responsibility to the AI tool; the user is accountable for all consequences
- All employees must follow employer AI use policies and verify outputs before professional use
Corrective Action
Following the $2000 loss, Michael ceased using AI for business emails and reverted to manual communication methods. While this has increased response times, he determined that avoiding further costly errors was the priority.
In Summary
Australian businesses and workers using generative AI tools in client-facing communications are encouraged to implement robust verification protocols and consult their employer’s AI use policy. For workplace health and safety concerns related to AI tool deployment, contact your state or territory workplace regulator or visit the Fair Work Ombudsman at www.fairwork.gov.au.